Friday, January 21, 2011

AGAINST ALL... LAWS


Another hottest year in 2010; debido a que realmente me siento magnánimo (although, several points -by today you must know them by heart- remain unresolved like, for instance, why still we are using only the 1961-1990 mean? As me and one of my former PhD generation mates asked to one of the holy cows in the Global Warming lecture without getting a straight answer) esta noche let's concede it; what is much more difficult to forgive $ is why we all are doing so little to tackle the biggest problem of our century (Stern dixit).


One simpler issue kept me apart from the keyboard for about a week (at least this time did not take 40 days and nights). As closer as you can get, I received another feedback, alguien que me recalca que sometimes my things aren't so great, quien es capaz de recordarme que no siempre podemos ser solo “faroles” de la calle, y que small things also do matter, that made me retreat to my bunker as a caveman to meditate about it.

En esas estaba, pondering my own domestic affairs, and getting to the conclusion that some of these critics are very likely right, when this week activities brought more ocassions to evaluate the present state of the planet, sorry, our nation, he he!!!

Por principio de cuentas, alcancé a arañar “la verdad” de que es posible pulverizar reglas no escritas de il popolo, que algunos -en su infinita soberbia- pretenden elevar al rango de leyes inmutables.


“...aguas, ya no se aprende igual...”

Al principiar esta jornada semanal, mi chinita y yo recibimos la visita de una ex housemate, que ya está a punto de terminar sus investigaciones en el extranjero. Ella me trae noticias frescas sobre mi antiguos compas, sobre todo de los asiduos visitantes al bar de los graduados: que si mi cuaderno, el chilaquil, ya terminó y ahora tiene other tasks to be accomplished en Centroamérica; que si mi coleguita sigue en la misma ivory tower where I used to be kink, pardon, king not so long ago; y uno de ellos me recuerda el viaje en Micro que hicimos otro de mis compas de la capirucha, el super user, y yo desde el norte de la ciudad a Viveros, cuando yo le decia: “pues yo tengo que sacarme de la cabeza eso de que ya estoy muy betabel pa' esos trotes y tengo que terminar y regresar aquí a cómo de lugar, mi estimado”, volviendo a nuestro latin lover, me dice que el golden boy, yunque sponsored, state awarded en la chupentud, sigue allá apadrinado por vaya asté a saber quién, sin tener pa' cuando terminar and be scouted by one of our government offices, just like one of the former drinking partners del cuña'o pródigo. En fin, allá ellos, que con su PAN se lo coman, más acá, ¡hay que reconstruir el país desde sus merititos cimientos, chinga!




“...a mí me otorgaron un título académico no uno nobiliario...”



By the way, swearing and laughing out loud (LOL) has become good excuse to slow down -a bit- my not normal (I suppose for not a small number) personality (ave de tempestades, remember? I won't change that, sorry). Just because we share the same working place and atmosphere -as my wife reminds me-, I can compromise on the issue, retreating myself with a huge banner saying “...a mí me otorgaron un título académico no uno nobiliario...”, ¡Dios me libre de comportarme como tales hipócritas! What is much more difficult to concede is to stop me constructing a strong Work Team ($ ¿no que Juan Camaney, compa? ¿Verdad que es infinitamente más complicado tener ideas propias?; te la regalo, no es la única y ni siquiera la mejor) for the time I stay -relatively happy- there.



ñÑáéíóúÁÉÍÓÚ¿?¡!




AL TIEMPO.


ENCORE MANAZEADO:



Danton 1/17- English subtitles









Against All Odds - Phil Collins (HQ Audio)


http://marcosalas.blogspot.com/2011/01/against-all.html
http://creatividadsocialmentecomprometida.blogspot.com/2011/01/against-all.html

Hablando de alianzas

Adolfo Sánchez Rebolledo

¿Puede ir la izquierda en alianza electoral con el PAN sin avalar las políticas del gobierno federal? ¿Hay forma de crear una plataforma común en la esfera local haciendo abstracción de lo que cada una de las fuerzas representa en el plano nacional?

Esas preguntas, más otras muchas, alimentan el debate en curso en torno a las elecciones en el estado de México, convertidas ya en una suerte de barómetro de la carrera presidencial. Según la lógica de los aliancistas, la respuesta es que no sólo se puede sino que se debe avanzar por ese camino, pero el argumento más bien defensivo se funda en la teoría del mal menor, según la cual el PRI es el obstáculo principal para el desarrollo social y político de México. Conseguir la alternancia en el estado de México sería, pues, el primer paso para frenar el ascenso del tricolor y el fortalecimiento de Peña Nieto, hoy en ruta sin obstáculos hacia la Presidencia. Intentar la coalición en ese caso, se afirma, no sólo es una oportunidad electoral, dictada por la necesidad de sobrevivencia, sino una apuesta por el futuro. Casi una tarea histórica de los demócratas. Borrar las diferencias de "principios" entre la derecha y la izquierda aparecería, según esto, como un acto de puro realismo político.

Este planteamiento no es erróneo porque manifieste genuina preocupación ante la candidatura de Peña Nieto, a todas luces portador de un proyecto de concentración del poder, sino porque olvida poner en el balance nacional los 10 años de alternancia gobernados por el PAN, la crítica a fondo de la nueva y fangosa realidad configurada por las alianzas públicas y subterráneas entre ambos partidos (PRI-PAN)

Si el PRI se impone, se dice, la transformación democrática se estancará o, peor, dará un vuelco autoritario, como si en verdad la calidad de nuestra vida pública mejorara en vez de caer a ojos vistas. Los partidarios de las coaliciones podrían argüir, aunque se cuidan de hacerlo, que la "transición" estará incompleta mientras el PRI subsista para disputar el poder. Pero tampoco esa es su visión. Por el contrario, si hablan de alianzas o coaliciones entre adversarios reconocidos es porque dan por supuesta la normalidad democrática, aunque, paradójicamente, en cada elección sexenal "descubran" contendientes capaces de poner en "peligro" el funcionamiento del sistema. En otras palabras, fuera del objetivo de frenar a Peña Nieto (y, en su caso a AMLO) y no perder demasiados votos, no hay un planteamiento estratégico que permita salvar la crisis institucional y darle nuevas perspectivas a la competencia política.

De alguna manera, este enfoque vive del pasado bajo la sombra perversa de la restauración, un fantasma que se burla de las atribuladas conciencias que vieron en el 2000 el nacimiento de una era de luminosa civilidad. Se juzga al PRI por lo que siempre tuvo de aparato de Estado subordinado al centralismo presidencial, por sus pesadas herencias autoritarias, sin percibir cómo bajo las reglas de la "normalidad democrática" se viene articulando una nueva constelación de intereses, surgida a partir de la descomposición general del régimen y el ascenso imparable de los poderes fácticos, pero concretada en los feudos de poder implantados en entidades federativas y municipios que hoy concentran buena parte de los recursos y atribuciones del Estado. Eso es lo nuevo. A esa realidad no es ajeno el panismo, porque este partido es el responsable directo de las desviaciones del proceso democrático en los años recientes.

No es exacto decir que el PAN y el PRI son clones como salidos de una misma matriz, pero si es válido asegurar que entre ellos (o al menos entre sus círculos más influyentes) hay en potencia un partido por nombrar y construir, un campo de entendimiento que abarca cuestiones fundamentales de la economía y la perspectiva de futuro (y hace poco también una visión conservadora de la moral pública), muy superior en alcances e influencia de la que tendría esa franja del priísmo más cercana a la izquierda que aún trata de sobrevivir.

En rigor, el fracaso del PAN para realizar las reformas democráticas que la sociedad venía exigiendo a la hora de la alternacia, las concesiones y la decisión de cerrar el camino a la izquierda explica, en buena medida, la "resurrección" de Peña Nieto como figura emblemática de la coalición del poder dominante.

Por eso es un grave error político pretender hacer del antagonismo autoritarismo/democracia el único eje de la disputa por el poder en el México de hoy, sin ubicarlo en la crítica del rumbo general del país; cuestionando la viabilidad del sistema político tal y como ahora funciona, el estancamiento seudodemocrático que profundiza la desigualdad e impide enfilar a un nuevo ciclo de desarrollo social y nacional bajo el contexto de la globalización. Ese es el desafío que sólo el cambio en la correlación de fuerzas a escala nacional permitirá enfrentar con posibilidades de éxito, pensando incluso en un escenario posterior al 2012, que no es, por cierto, la fecha del fin del mundo. Aunque lo parezca. La izquierda no puede eludir sus compromisos.

Thursday, January 20, 2011


Morgan Stanley awards staff $16bn as profits triple

• Morgan Stanley insists it fundamentally restructured pay policy
• Wall Street bank's annual profit jumps from $1.3bn to $4.5bn
• 51% of revenue set aside for pay, down from 62%


  • guardian.co.uk,
  • Article history
  • Morgan Stanley
    Morgan Stanley enjoyed a 30%-plus rise in revenues and a big jump in profits. Photograph: Seth Wenig/AP

    Pay and bonuses at Morgan Stanley have risen by 8.5% to an average $255,000 (£160,000) per employee after the Wall Street firm set aside $16bn to pay bonuses, salaries and benefits in 2010.

    Profits at the bank, a close rival of Goldman Sachs, more than tripled to $4.5bn in 2010 as against $1.3bn for 2009. Revenue, out of which bonuses are paid, rose 35% to $31.6bn, although that figure fell short of expectations after trading revenue was lower than predicted. Even so, Morgan Stanley shares were up in pre-market trading.

    James Gorman, the chief executive, who last year refused to take a cash bonus, opting for a payout in shares instead, said he was "pleased with progress".

    "But there is a great deal of work to do across Morgan Stanley's global franchise as we look to deliver first-class service to our clients and long-term value to our shareholders and employees," Gorman added.

    Morgan Stanley is reporting a day after Goldman Sachs was accused of "sticking two fingers up to austerity Britain" by handing its staff a $15.3bn pay and bonus pool – an average of $430,000 per employee.

    Analysts said that Morgan Stanley's average pay of $255,000 was difficult to compare with the $235,000 average it paid in 2009 as the earlier figures did not include a full year of the Smith Barney wealth management firm, a joint venture with Citigroup. The bank showed a $1.7bn rise in compensation costs at its wealth management business – largely Smith Barney – so if this is excluded the average pay and bonus award in 2010 is $224,000, a drop on 2009.

    The firm is said to have been warning staff internally that bonuses would be lower this year and stressed that it had "fundamentally restructured" the way it pays its 62,540 staff. For the 2010 bonus round, which will begin in coming days, it has increased the amount of a bonus that is subject to deferral from 40% to 60%. For the most senior staff sitting on the operating committee, that proportion is increased to more than 80% from 75%.

    Some 51% of revenues are being set aside to pay staff in 2010, down from 62% in 2009.

    The firm, which employs approximately 7,000 in the City, incurred a $242m charge for former chancellor Alistair Darling's one-off bonus tax, which was levied on bonuses over £25,000 until April last year.

    Like Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley suffered a drop in its trading revenues in the fourth quarter but its retail brokerage operations offset this fall.


Tunisian army fires warning shots at protesters

Rounds fired into air as demonstrators converge on headquarters of former ruling party


  • guardian.co.uk,
  • Article history
  • Protesters outside party headquarters in Tunis
    Tunisians protest against the interim government outside the headquarters of the former ruling party. Photograph: Martin Bureau/AFP/Getty Images

    The Tunisian army fired warning shots in the capital today as demonstrators converged on the headquarters of the long-time ruling party.

    Protesters climbed over the RCD party offices in central Tunis and dismantled the sign bearing its name.

    The new unity government has been criticised for being mostly made up of politicians from the RCD party, which was founded by Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali, the ousted president who fled to Saudi Arabia on Friday after 23 years in power.

    Another member of the government, Zouheir M'dhaffer, resigned today after four ministers quit earlier this week. M'dhaffer, who was administrative development minister, had been a member of Ben Ali's party but was not considered close to the ousted leader.

    The army fired rounds into the air outside the party headquarters, scattering some protesters. The building was protected by an army tank, trucks and troops.

    Police repeatedly shot at protesters in the weeks leading up to the ousting of Ben Ali, killing several people, but the army has been playing more of a peacekeeping role since it was brought in to try to restore order last week .

    Soldiers have been protecting strategic sites and public buildings and manning checkpoints around the capital, but there have been no reports of them firing on unarmed civilians since Ben Ali left.

    The crowd of protesters swelled to 1,500 today, many chanting, "The people want the government down." Others waved baguettes to symbolise the need to end food shortages.

    Ahmad al-Ouni, brought his children aged eight and four to the demonstration. "I want them to smell their free country and to see the new Tunis without fear," he said while his children drew Tunisian flags.

    Another demonstrator said the protests would continue until all ministers and members of parliament with links to the RCD party were removed from power.

    "This revolution cannot be stolen from us and we will not tire from demonstrating, and we will come out every day if we have to," said Mohsen Kaabi, 55, a former military officer.

    The interim government has attempted to ease tensions by releasing all the country's political prisoners.

    National television also reported that least 33 members of Ben Ali's family were taken into custody as they tried to flee the country. Prosecutors are investigating overseas bank accounts, property and other assets held by Ben Ali, his wife, Leila Trabelsi, and other relatives.

    Swiss officials froze all assets tied to Ben Ali's family yesterday, estimating that Tunisian officials had put about $620m into Swiss banks. In Paris, the anti-corruption group Transparency International France and two other associations filed suits alleging corruption by Ben Ali and his wife.

    A French government minister said the Tunisian central bank director, Taoufik Baccar, had resigned following widespread rumours that the president's wife had fled with a huge stash of gold.

    Tunisia's central bank took control of Banque Zitouna, which was founded by a son-in-law of Ben Ali, to protect its deposits.



Juan Pablo II, beato por decreto de Estado

Bernardo Barranco V.

Estos días me he estado preguntando qué hay detrás de la beatificación de Juan Pablo II. Por qué la Iglesia de Benedicto XVI toma tantos riesgos para levantar a los altares a un hombre de fe, indudablemente profunda, pero que al mismo tiempo fue un jefe de Estado, con todas las contingencias que implica el larguísimo tiempo que condujo a la Iglesia católica. La celeridad con que se gestionó la beatificación de la madre Teresa de Calcuta no tuvo ninguna oposición ni escollos por las características místicas y la naturaleza de su opción, de entrega incondicional hacia los pobres. Es decir, era tal el reconocimiento que no representaba polémicas mayores. En cambio, la celeridad en el caso de Juan Pablo II se antoja imprudente, pues pueden surgir documentos, testimonios y hechos que pongan en entredicho todo el proceso de la causa de beatificación que ha llevado la Santa Sede con una aparente aureola de rigor. Parece no importarle, pues desde hace tiempo hubo consigna de beatificar por decreto a Karol Wojtyla. Por ello, me inclino a pensar que más que una decisión religiosa es una opción política. Es que el pontífice, durante 27 años, asumió riesgos en diferentes coyunturas y tomó decisiones polémicas. ¿Por qué la prisa? Sobre todo que aún quedan por evaluar con mayor serenidad la actuación del pontífice polaco durante el derrumbe del bloque socialista, las acciones encubiertas de la Iglesia católica durante el fin de la guerra fría; sus alianzas con Reagan, la CIA, como apenas lo registran Carl Bernstein y Marco Politi en su libro clásico Su santidad, Juan Pablo II y la historia oculta de nuestro tiempo (1996). No podemos poner en duda el don religioso de un personaje fuera de serie, carismático y mediático en extremo como fue Juan Pablo. Sin embargo, quedan por evaluar su cerrazón al tema del papel de la mujer dentro de la Iglesia y en la sociedad; los derechos humanos de cientos de sacerdotes progresistas y agentes de pastoral que en algún momento abrazaron el talante de la teología de la liberación; todos sufrieron el embate autoritario que los segregaba, cuestionaba su reflexión y coartaba su libertad de discernimiento. Años verdaderamente oscuros en la historia moderna de la Iglesia en América Latina. Y, por supuesto, no se puede pasar por alto el disciplinamiento de aquellos teólogos y teólogas en Estados Unidos y Europa que se atrevieron a explorar temas de género, sexualidad y moral, quienes también padecieron coerción eclesiástica. Se tendría necesariamente que evaluar el nombramiento de obispos sumisos y disciplinados a Roma, sí, pero sin fortaleza ni convicción pastoral que tienen sumida a la Iglesia en muchos países, como México, en una profunda crisis religiosa. Brillantes pensadores, como Leonardo Boff, dejan la vida religiosa y gran parte de una valiosa generación de laicos comprometidos entra en una forzada diáspora, fruto del conservadurismo promovido por Juan Pablo II. Por tanto, la cuestión va más allá del encubrimiento a pederastas y en especial el disimulo y complicidad hacia Marcial Maciel. Estamos obligados a desplegar un discernimiento más profundo y agudo de un hombre que no puede desligarse de su pontificado.

Resulta contradictorio que sea en México, la tierra y nación más fértil para Wojtyla, donde surgen muchas dudas y reproches a su beatificación. Sin duda, en el caso Maciel resulta hasta ridículo el argumento del desconocimiento y engaño siniestro hacia el Papa. Recordemos que en nuestro país Juan Pablo II tuvo una plataforma de lanzamiento mundial, las imágenes marcaron su pontificado: la multitud entregada al pontífice. Aquí descubre y desarrolla su fórmula de Papa viajero, que convoca a muchedumbres y convive con desenfado la diversidad de las culturas. Da la impresión que no gobierna a la Iglesia en Roma, sino desde sus viajes incide en las circunstancias locales, porque se convierte en un actor protagónico en las plazas que visita y posiciona con energía las agendas de las iglesias locales con perspectiva pontifical.

Todos hemos sido testigos cómo la Iglesia en los años recientes ha perdido presencia internacional. Su autoridad moral se ha deteriorado y a Benedicto XVI se le percibe acosado por el fuego cruzado en las luchas palaciegas del Vaticano, llamado por él mismo "enemigo interno". Quizá la Iglesia católica quiera recuperar en medio de esta crisis parte del glamour, con la beatificación, de su pasado reciente aunque sea una ilusoria burbuja, recuperar ese triunfalismo de masas. Probablemente también, incida la vieja guardia curial de Juan Pablo II, que ante las amenazas y juicios críticos de encubrimiento y corrupción (Valentina Alazraki) haya empujado para protegerse. Por tanto, pretenden no sólo la beatificación del personaje, sino del pontificado. También cabe la hipótesis de que sea el propio Benedicto XVI quien quiera enviar una clara señal, con la beatificación, de continuidad. Fortalecer su rol, zarandeado por las tempestades mediáticas y crisis internas que han puesto en cuestión su mando. Legitimar pues, su anunciado proyecto de saneamiento, reforma de la curia, y sobre todo posicionamiento moderado frente al Concilio Vaticano II. Hay, como sabemos, sectores progresistas, muy disminuidos, que le reprochan haber abandonado los principios e inspiración conciliar (Hans Kung) y otros sectores teológicamente ultraconservadores que le presionan para que redacte una especie de Syllabus o colección de errores y abusos de interpretación del mítico espíritu conciliar. Las polémicas en torno a la beatificación de Juan Pablo II llevan a una reflexión más profunda y serena de su pontificado; a seis años de su muerte nos permite analizar con mayor claridad aciertos y yerros de un pontificado que, independientemente de sesgos, ha marcado profundamente la vida y la historia de la Iglesia católica contemporánea.



The US-China summit


20 January 2011

Behind the pomp and diplomatic niceties, what dominates the state visit of Chinese President Hu Jintao to Washington is the growth of tensions between the world’s two biggest economies.

Contrary to the general presentation in the US media, which echoes the Obama administration in portraying Beijing as the aggressor, the primary responsibility for the escalation of tensions in East Asia lies with the United States. Since Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared 18 months ago that the US was “back in East Asia,” Washington has worked relentlessly to isolate China and contain its growing influence in Asia and internationally.

This has involved a three-pronged attack—economic, diplomatic and military. Only a month ago the world was holding its breath in fear of the outbreak of war on the Korean Peninsula. South Korea, with US support and participation, was holding a live-fire military exercise in the same disputed waters where a similar exercise the previous month had provoked North Korea to fire on a South Korean-held island, killing two South Korean Marines and two civilian inhabitants.

Under Chinese pressure, North Korea pulled back from its threat to retaliate militarily in the face of such a provocation. This, however, has not altered the US policy of stoking up tensions in Asia in order to maintain US dominance at the expense of China.

The standoff between North and South Korea was the most recent in a series of crises in East Asia involving murky naval incidents which were utilized, at the direction of the United States, to demonize North Korea and its main ally, China.

Last July, Secretary of State Clinton intervened into longstanding disputes between China and its neighbors over islands in the South China Sea, lining up against China and declaring “freedom of navigation” in the South China to be a vital US interest. This is a direct threat to Chinese control over sea lanes that are critical to its trade and security.

Only last week, the US held a joint naval exercise with South Korea in the Yellow Sea, deploying the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Carl Vinson.

Notwithstanding such provocations, Obama insisted at the joint press conference with President Hu on Wednesday that the United States welcomed China’s rise. At the same time, he reiterated US demands that China sharply raise the exchange rate of its currency and remove subsidies to its industries in order to provide a “level playing field” for American firms. He also criticized China’s human rights record.

The carefully scripted news conference allowed only two questions each from American and Chinese reporters. Obama left it to the US reporters to express overt hostility toward Hu and China.

Ben Feller of the Associated Press asked how Obama could justify an alliance with a country “known for treating its people so poorly, for using censorship and force to repress its people.”

The question reflected the selective and hypocritical outrage of the American media over anti-democratic practices. No such questions are ever put to Obama, who has absolutely no standing to lecture China, notwithstanding that regime’s repressive hand, or anyone else on human rights.

Obama has, after all, kept the gulag at Guantanamo open; ordered the assassination of alleged terrorists, including an American citizen; upheld the “right” of the president to imprison people for life without a trial; continued the practice of “rendering” people to countries that practice torture; rejected the prosecution of Bush-era torturers; expanded domestic spying; and is currently seeking to destroy WikiLeaks and Julian Assange for exposing the lies and crimes of US imperialism.

The second US reporter, Hans Nichols from Bloomberg, asked how Obama would allay the fears of congressmen who see China as “an economic threat,” and followed up by asking how badly China’s “depressing its currency” harmed the White House’s efforts to create jobs and lower unemployment in the US.

The US has kept up a steady drumbeat that China is manipulating and undervaluing its currency in order to lower the price of its exports and gain an unfair trade advantage. In fact, the biggest currency manipulator by far is the United States. By keeping interest rates near zero and electronically printing hundreds of billions of dollars, the US is massively devaluing the dollar, cheapening its exports relative to rivals such as China, Japan, South Korea, Germany and Brazil.

It is also flooding the world with hot money, forcing up the exchange rates of a host of countries, stoking inflation and creating asset bubbles. China has, as a result, been hit with rising inflation, forcing it to raise its interest rates twice within the past several months.

In a speech last week in advance of the summit, US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner expanded Washington’s economic demands, suggesting that China could gain wider access to the US market and technology only if, in addition to sharply raising its exchange rate, it reduced the role of the state in its economy, ended policies that “discriminate against US companies,” and removed preferences for domestic firms.

In other words, China should open its economy to the unfettered exploitation of American capitalism and accept the status of an economic colony.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, speaking in Japan on Friday, called on Tokyo to expand its military and step up its military cooperation with the US, praising in particular Japan’s decision to shift the focus of its forces to its southwest islands—i.e., facing onto the Chinese mainland. He also invoked the US-Japan security treaty of 1960, which obliges the US to militarily defend Japan in the event of an armed conflict between it and China.

Open anti-China hysteria on the occasion of Hu’s state visit was left to congressmen and senators from both parties. Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Hu a “dictator” and refused to attend the White House state dinner in his honor Wednesday night. Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner also boycotted the event.

Senator Charles Schumer (Democrat of New York) introduced a bill targeting China that would impose punitive tariffs on “currency manipulators” and bar firms from such countries from receiving US government contracts. “This legislation sends a message to China that says we are fed up with your government’s intransigence over currency manipulation,” he declared, adding, “If you refuse to play by the rules, we will force you to do so.”

The New York Times editorialized: “For Mr. Obama, the top items include: China’s currency manipulation; its enabling of North Korea and Iran; its abuse of human rights; and its recent challenge to American naval supremacy in the western Pacific… Mr. Obama has made clear that he won’t stand by while China tries to bully its neighbors.”

The Wall Street Journal in its editorial raised the prospect of war with China and World War III, writing: “But China’s new truculence is once again raising concern that Beijing is intent on dominating its region and destabilizing the world order, much as the Kaiser’s Germany did a century ago.”

In fact, as leaked WikiLeaks cables have shown, Secretary of State Clinton and the then-prime minister of Australia and current foreign minister, Kevin Rudd, discussed the need to prepare for the eventuality of war with China.

This year’s US Joint Forces Command’s Joint Operating Environment report—a strategic guide to perceived threats and future US military engagements—includes the following chilling warning: “The course that China takes will determine much about the character and nature of the 21st Century—whether it will be ‘another bloody century’ or one of peaceful cooperation.”

The mounting danger of war between the US and China, which would almost certainly escalate into a global conflagration, is rooted in deep-going shifts in the world economy and the global balance of forces: China’s rise to become the world’s second largest economy and the decline in the global economic position of the United States.

American imperialism has turned ever more violently to the use of military force to offset its economic decline, and it has no intention of peacefully ceding to China the dominance of Asia or any other region.

The only answer to the growth of militarism in general and the incendiary role of US imperialism in particular is the struggle to unite the working class internationally in the fight for socialism.

Barry Grey


Venezuela cuenta con la mayor reserva de petróleo del mundo

teleSUR


Venezuela cuenta con el mayor depósito de crudo en el mundo, delante de Arabia Saudita, informó este miércoles el ministro venezolano de Energía y Petróleo, Rafael Ramírez, al anunciar la certificación del volumen de reservas de petróleo por 297 mil millones de barriles.

“A finales del año 2010 teníamos un nivel de 217 mil millones de barriles de petróleo y estamos ahorita, a principios de este año ya en posición de certificar 297 mil millones de barriles”, celebró Ramírez durante declaraciones a la prensa.

Con los datos suministrados por el titular de la cartera de Petróleo, Venezuela se afianza como el primer país con mayores reservas de crudo, escoltado por Arabia Saudita, que cuenta con 266 mil millones de barriles.

Detrás de Arabia Saudita se encuentran Irán y Kuwait, de acuerdo a los datos de la Organización de Países Exportadores de Petróleo (OPEP).

Los datos han sido recolectados por la estatal Petróleos de Venezuela (Pdvsa) y de las diferentes empresas extranjeras que trabajan en el país. Posteriormente, certificados por la OPEP.

El funcionario recordó que cuando el presidente de la nación suramericana, Hugo Chávez, ganó las elecciones por primera vez en 1998, Venezuela, era el primer de crudo de la región, pues contaba con un nivel de reservas de 75 mil millones de barriles de petróleo.

"Vamos a ser un país centenario en la producción de petróleo, pero a diferencia de muchos países que han agotado su base de recursos, Venezuela sigue ampliando su base de recursos", manifestó.

Del total certificado, "220 mil millones son de la Faja del Orinoco, lo cual nos da como base de recursos un piso sólido y cierto para todo nuestro plan de expansión", se congratuló el ministro.

La Faja Petrolífera del Orinoco es la mayor reserva de hidrocarburos a nivel mundial.

En 2007, el Gobierno venezolano nacionalizó y recuperó el control de los recursos petroleros, desde entonces se ha recurrido a diversos socios extranjeros para explotar el crudo e invertir en los proyectos.

Cualquier empresa extranjera tiene participación minoritaria en todos estos proyectos.

"Con estas reservas, hasta hoy y al ritmo de explotaciones que llevamos, Venezuela tiene petróleo para más de 200 años y no hay país en este planeta que tenga petróleo para 200 años", informó el presidente Chávez recientemente.

Por otro lado, el ministro Ramírez mantiene la esperanza de que este 2011 tenga una producción temprana de 50 mil barriles por día, en los proyectos de crudo pesado de la Faja del Orinoco (sur).

“Este es un año de desarrollo de infraestructura en la Faja. Pensamos que tendremos al menos unos 50 mil barriles por día de producción temprana este mismo año”, indicó.

"Directamente en la Faja, este año tendremos unos tres mil millones de dólares de inversión", acotó.

Del mismo modo, señaló que el valor del barril de petróleo se acerca a los 100 dólares.

Por otro lado, el ministro venezolano anunció que se prevé la ampliación de la participación de Turquía en el desarrollo del Plan habitacional que se ejecuta en el país.

"Esta tarde nos reuniremos con el ministro de vivienda venezolano para evaluarlo”, aseguró, y relató que el ministro turco de Energía, Taner Yildiz, “ha traído, como parte de su delegación, al responsable de ese sector de las empresas del Estado turco, que es un consorcio muy importante”.

Ramírez hizo las declaraciones después de la reunión que sostuvo con su homólogo de Turquía.

"Turquía es un gran país con un alto nivel de industrialización. Está geostrategicamente insertado entre Europa y Asia y hemos hablado de todas las posibilidades de cooperación en toda la cadena del sector energético", sostuvo.

En el marco de las conversaciones, Ramírez señaló que ambas naciones evaluaron las inversiones que podrían desarrollarse en la Faja del Orinoco.

Otro de los puntos consultados en la agenda fue la cooperación en el área de refinación en Turquía, el suministro de productos hidrocarburos y el coque de petróleo para la generación eléctrica.

"Tenemos un conjunto de acuerdos y áreas de cooperación, lo que nos permite calificar esta reunión como extraordinaria", afirmó Ramírez.

Finalmente, informó que esta prevista una visita de su par turco a la Faja Petrolífera del Orinoco, con el fin de supervisar directamente las áreas de producción y de mejoramiento.


Fuente: http://telesurtv.net/secciones/noticias/87530-NN/venezuela-cuenta-con-la-mayor-reserva-de-petroleo-del-mundo/

Consideran erróneo estudio alarmista sobre calentamiento global

La investigación, que confunde el aumento del 'equilibrio' de la temperatura con el 'aumento de la temperatura transitoria fue retirada.

Afp

Publicado: 19/01/2011 14:56

Washington. Un reciente estudio sobre el cambio climático de una organización con sede en Argentina, que proyectaba un aumento de temperatura de 2.4º centígrados y una generalizada escasez alimentaria mundial en la próxima década, tiene importantes errores, dijeron científicos este miércoles.

El trabajo fue publicado en EurekAlert, un servicio independiente para periodistas creado por la Asociación Estadunidense para el Avance de la Ciencia (AAAS, por sus siglas en inglés), y fue divulgado por numerosas agencias internacionales de noticias, entre ellas AFP.

Pero la AAAS retiró el estudio de su página, cuando un grupo de expertos señalaron errores en su enfoque.

Según el estudio publicado el martes, la temperatura del planeta podría aumentar 2.4 grados centígrados de aquí a 2020. Con esa perspectiva, la combinación del impacto del cambio climático en la producción agrícola y del crecimiento de la población mundial, que llegará a los 7 mil 800 millones de individuos de aquí a 2020, conllevará cosechas insuficientes.

La producción mundial de trigo sufriría un déficit del 14 por ciento respecto a la demanda de aquí a 10 años, mientras "la producción global de trigo, arroz, maíz y soja caerá entre un 2.5 por ciento y un 5 por ciento" en América Latina, estimaba el informe.

No obstante, "un periodista de (el diario británico) The Guardian nos alertó ayer (martes) sobre unas dudas respecto a esta noticia enviada por la oficina de relaciones públicas Hoffman & Hoffman", escribió la portavoz de la AAAS Ginger Pinholster en un correo electrónico a la AFP.

"Inmediatamente contactamos a un experto en cambio climático, que confirmó que la información también le planteaba dudas. Rápidamente quitamos el informe de nuestro sitio web y contactamos a la organización que lo había enviado".

El científico Osvaldo Canziani, que formó parte del Panel Intergubernamental sobre Cambio Climático (IPCC), figura como asesor científico del estudio.

El IPCC, cuyas cifras fueron citadas como base para las proyecciones de este trabajo, ganó junto al ex vicepresidente de Estados Unidos, Al Gore, el premio Nobel de la Paz en 2007 por su esfuerzo de divulgación sobre los riesgos del cambio climático.

El portavoz de Canziani dijo el martes que el científico estaba enfermo y no podía dar entrevistas.

El estudio elaboró sus conclusiones en base a cifras de este organismo de la ONU y la "ruta que el mundo está siguiendo actualmente", dijo la principal autora de la investigación, Liliana Hisas, de la Fundación Ecológica Universal (FEU, un organismo no gubernamental con sede en Argentina).

Pero el climatólogo Rey Weymann dijo a la AFP que "el estudio contiene un error importante, dado que confunde el aumento del 'equilibrio' de la temperatura con el 'aumento de la temperatura transitoria'." También señaló que Hisas fue informada con antelación de los problemas del informe antes de que fuera publicado.

"La autora del estudio fue informada por varios de nosotros sobre este error, pero dijo que era demasiado tarde para cambiarlo", dijo Weymann.

El científico Scott Mandia indicó a la AFP que tomaría "varias décadas" alcanzar un nivel de calentamiento de 2.4º centígrados y describió el percance como un "error honesto y común", que no obstante dará argumentos a quienes son escépticos sobre la responsabilidad de los humanos en el cambio climático.

"Es cierto, estamos yendo hacia un aumento de 2.4º centígrados, sólo que eso no sucederá en 2020", explicó.

Marshall Hoffman, de la firma de relaciones públicas que divulgó el informe en nombre de la FEU, dijo que el grupo apoya el estudio.

"La NASA y la NOAA (la Administración Oceánica y Atmosférica Estadunidense) estimaban que la temperatura mundial aumentaría un grado entre 2005 y 2010. Si esto se mantiene, serán dos grados para 2015", explicó Hoffman. Respecto a este comentario, Mandia dijo a la AFP: "Hoffman aún está confundido".


Will Climate Change Cause Crop Shortfalls by 2020?: Scientific American

Posted on January 20, 2011 by Shiva


Earth may be 2.4 degrees Celsius warmer by 2020, potentially triggering global scrambles for food supplies, according to a new analysis

Earth may be 2.4 degrees Celsius warmer by 2020, potentially triggering global scrambles for food supplies, according to a new analysis Image: Flickr via IRRI Images

Earth may be 2.4 degrees Celsius warmer by 2020, potentially triggering global scrambles for food supplies, according to a new analysis.

Work from the Universal Ecological Fund, the U.S. branch of Argentina-based nonprofit Fundación Ecológica Universal (FEU), sketches a somber portrait for world hunger by the end of the decade.

Rising temperatures will slash yields for rice, wheat and corn throughout the developing world, exacerbating food price volatility and increasing the number of undernourished people, the report warns.

It projects that food demand will substantially dwarf available supply.

The group drew upon existing climate and food production data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the World Meteorological Organization and other U.N. agencies to draw its conclusions.

Chief among its findings, UEF said, is that if the planet continues on a business-as-usual path, temperatures may rise at least 2.4 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels — or 4.3 degrees Fahrenheit — by 2020. Crossing a 2-degree-Celsius climate threshold is commonly considered dangerous.

The level of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere, which was 284 parts per million in the preindustrial era, tallies more than 385 ppm today. By 2020, it could reach 490 ppm, cautions the report. Carbon concentrations that high are associated with a global temperature rise of 2.4 degrees Celsius, according to IPCC estimates.

Potential timing gap
Still, it’s not certain how quickly the planet would heat up if the planet had that concentration, said climate scientist Brenda Ekwurzel, with the Union of Concerned Scientists.

"If you look at Earth as an oven, by hitting 490 you turn the dial, but it could take a while for the oven to reach the temperature," she said.

Climate scientist Osvaldo Canziani served as the scientific adviser on the study, going over it "line by line," said Liliana Hisas, the executive director of the Universal Ecological Fund and author of the report. Canziani was unavailable for comment.

While not every part of the planet is expected to experience adverse effects of climate-linked impacts on agriculture, the report’s numbers suggest that by 2020 there will be a 14 percent deficit between wheat production and demand, global rice production will stand at an 11 percent deficit, and there will be a 9 percent deficit in corn production. Soybeans, however, are expected to have a 5 percent surplus.

To meet the needs of a world that is expected to have an additional 890 million people by 2020, the global community would need to increase food production by about 13 percent, the report states.

Josef Schmidhuber, a senior policy analyst at the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, questioned some of the underlying assumptions for regional production figures and said that this UEF study also fails to consider other external factors that could affect these results.

"The only rationale for this to hold would be for climate change to have such a strong impact on the non-agricultural economy that people would lose purchasing power and thus would be so poor they couldn’t afford the food they need to meet the requirements," Schmidhuber said. "Foodsecurity is much more than a production problem — it reflects above all a lack of access to food and a lack of income," he said.

Schmidhuber contends that looking at food security purely in the context of the impacts of food production will lead to overstatements of hunger estimates.

Click here to read the study.

link http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-crop-shortfall

Wednesday, January 19, 2011


"No, a los niños no..."

Marcela Turati


MÉXICO, D.F., 18 de enero (Proceso).- Con su mano flaca y deforme, parecida a una pinza de cangrejo, el hombre extiende la copia de una carta que dirigió al ejército y firmó con su nombre: “Adán Abel Esparza Parra”.

El autor de la carta, fechada el 14 de abril de 2008, es un ranchero amable de 30 años y habla queda, que ensaya una mueca constante, un simulacro de sonrisa. A mitad de algunas frases guarda silencio, como si su mente trepara precipicios o quizás regresara un año atrás, al 1 de junio de 2007, cuando quedó inútil para el trabajo, mutilado del alma, inhabilitado para la vida.

Esa noche trasladaba a su familia en su pick up: en la cabina, a su lado, iban su esposa Griselda, su hermana Gloria Alicia y la maestra adolescente de sus hijos, Teresa de Jesús Flores Sánchez. Las mujeres llevaban sobre sus piernas a sus hijas Grisel Adanay y Juana Diosnirely, de tres y un año, respectivamente; en la caja viajaban los varones: su hijo mayor, Eduin Yoniel, de siete, y su sobrino menor por un año, José Duvuán, inseparables compañeros de juego.

Ese día le había tocado llevar a su hermana Gloria y a Teresa a un curso de capacitación obligatorio para maestras rurales. De regreso a casa, las luces de las viviendas de La Joya de Martínez se divisaban como foquitos de Navidad. Al salir de una curva se toparon con militares del 24 Regimiento de Caballería Motorizado asignados a recorrer la sierra sinaloense, como miles más que peinan el país en busca de narcos, de armas y de drogas.

“Estábamos a un kilómetro de la casa, cerquitas. No había ni una seña ni un soldado de esos que le hacen a uno el alto”, comenta el ranchero y enseguida guarda silencio, su espíritu migra a ese paraje.

–Y pos’ nos dispararon –completa luego de un rato.

El Adán Abel de aquella noche sintió un balazo en la mano que sostenía el volante. Con la camioneta en movimiento, bajó del vehículo con los brazos en alto y gritó:

–¡No disparen, traigo a mi familia, vienen niños!

Pero recibió un balazo en la otra mano. Ráfagas se incrustaron en la camioneta. Y en su mujer… en su hermana… en sus chiquitas… en su hijo y su sobrino.

–Levantaba las manos para indicarles que no tiraran, les hacía el alto, pues. Los balazos me tumbaban al suelo, me levantaba y me tumbaban –recuerda un año después para esta entrevista.

La camioneta, sin freno, se fue al barranco: quiso detenerla pero no pudo: tenía despojos en lugar de manos. “Yo ya no sabía de mí, vi que la camioneta se iba pero no alcancé a subir ni a frenar ni nada. El carro se fue. No le había puesto parkin a la camioneta en el mismo desespero de decirles que llevaba familia”.

Con la camioneta desbarrancada, él tumbado en el piso, pidió ayuda a los soldados, suplicó que avisaran por celular a su familia, pero nadie lo atendió. Todos estaban ocupados, subían y bajaban la barranca donde se estrelló la camioneta, se asomaban al interior de la cabina, volvían a subir. Estaban como desquiciados. Pedían por radio instrucciones.

–¡Auxilio, ayuda! –gritaba Adán Abel mientras tanto, con la esperanza de que algún vecino lo escuchara. En un golpe de determinación se arrastró al auto y aún no se explica cómo fue que sacó el radio con la boca, lo activó y avisó: “Nos acaban de balear”.

Vio llegar después a sus hermanos, a su mamá y a los vecinos del pequeño rancho que desobedecieron a los soldados que les cerraban el paso. Entre todos sacaron de la camioneta los cadáveres de Griselda y de sus pequeñas Grisel Adanay y Juana Diosnirely. Heridos pero con vida encontraron a Edwin, Juan, Teresa, José Duvuán y Gloria. Los subieron a varios carros. En el lugar quedaron regados los cuadernos escolares forrados con dibujos infantiles.

La gente esperó con los heridos en el campo abierto donde, según los militares, serían recogidos por un helicóptero; era cosa de esperarlo. Estuvieron a la intemperie media hora… una… dos horas… Hasta que se dieron cuenta del engaño. Tras discutir con los militares les arrancaron la autorización de llevar a los heridos por tierra al hospital, a condición de formar un convoy encabezado por vehículos verde olivo que jugaban el macabro juego del pa’lante-pa’tras: los camiones punteros avanzaban a un máximo de 40 kilómetros por hora, luego bloqueaban el camino, si es que no retrocedían.

–¿Qué pasa? –reclamó desesperado Eligio Esparza, hermano menor de Adán.

–Eso merecen por haber atacado a los soldados –recibió por respuesta.

Cada vez que un nuevo vehículo militar se incorporaba al convoy se repetía el ritual de revisar parejo a heridos, muertos y acompañantes, apuntarles con las armas, cortar cartucho si alguien repelaba e interrogarlos sobre la balacera.

Al niño José Duvuán lo despertaron al jalarlo de la camiseta, le esculcaron el cuerpecito, le cortaron el pantalón para verle bien la herida en la nalga.

–Señora, ¿qué pasó? –preguntó un militar recién incorporado a Fabiana Parra, la mamá de Adán y de Gloria, pasajera en esa caravana fúnebre.

–Los militares atacaron.

–No, señora, ¿cómo que los militares? Los militares no hacen eso, está equivocada –repeló su interrogador.

“En vez de pedir ambulancias pedían refuerzos”, agrega en la entrevista doña Fabiana, quien escucha el relato desde el sillón de espaldas al comedor donde Adán Abel narra la tragedia. Aunque había simulado que no escuchaba la repetición de la misma historia no pudo reprimir su indignado comentario.

El trayecto de dos horas duró ocho. La caravana llegó a las cuatro y media de la mañana al cuartel de Badiraguato. A los tripulantes no les autorizaron bajar de los vehículos. Esperaron al amanecer: vivos y muertos recostados juntos. La espera fue una agonía en la que vieron cómo se les iba escurriendo la vida a los heridos que sí habían aguantado el camino.

“Ya amanecimos en el carro junto con los cadáveres. Decían que no nos moviéramos a ningún lado hasta que no nos indicaran. Y ahí estuvimos. Hasta las ocho bajaron los cadáveres”, dice la abuela sin expresión. “Por el tiempo que hicimos en el camino, algunos de ellos, por lo menos dos, hubieran llegado con vida”.

El radiograma Bu345644 en el que el capitán de la misión, Cándido Alday Arriaga, informó sobre los sucesos al comandante de la Novena Zona Militar en Culiacán, señalaba otra versión distinta que indicaba que al acercarse al retén la camioneta en la oscuridad el grupo le marcó el alto para inspeccionarla, pero nunca bajó la velocidad; al contrario, ¡les echaron cinco balazos!

“El personal militar procedió a repeler la agresión disparando sus armas de fuego en contra del citado vehículo y sus tripulantes en repetidas ocasiones –continúa el reporte– y, una vez cesado el fuego, vio una persona herida en el camino, les proporcionaron los primeros auxilios, localizando en las inmediaciones del automóvil un costal al parecer de mariguana.”

Las investigaciones de la CNDH sacaron a la luz otra verdad: los miembros del batallón no sólo dispararon a ciudadanos inocentes y dejaron morir a los sobrevivientes, también los quisieron culpar de su tragedia. Mientras Adán Abel suplicaba tirado en el piso que llamaran a su familia, ellos movían las evidencias para falsear los hechos.

Ocho de los militares que dispararon estaban drogados (siete con mariguana, uno con cocaína y metanfetaminas). Uno no dejaba de reír cuando la gente, angustiada, auxiliaba a las víctimas. Los vecinos los recordaban bebiendo desde temprano al pie de la carretera.

El cabo de sanidad Eladio Pérez Arriaga sí alertó a sus compañeros de que en la pick up viajaban niños, pero fue ignorado. En el hospital de Culiacán, donde fue internado por “estrés agudo con embotamiento emocional subjetivo, reducción en su relación con su entorno y reexperimentación del evento traumático”, en su delirio repetía: “No, a los niños no…” l

Tuesday, January 18, 2011


Israel's Shadowy War on Iran

Mossad Zeros in on Tehran's Nuclear Program

By Dieter Bednarz and Ronen Bergman

An unexplained fire, disappearing scientists and attacks on prominent Iranian nuclear experts: The Israeli secret service Mossad seems to be waging a shadowy war on Tehran's nuclear program. Will it be enough to stop Iran's alleged drive to develop atomic weapons?

The young man in the spotlight appeared earnest and friendly, wearing a blue sweater and a freshly ironed shirt, his hair carefully combed. He seemed to want to project an air of credibility.

He sat in a brown leather swivel chair and steepled his fingertips in a manner often favored by politicians, before starting to speak. "My name is Majid Jamali Fash," he introduced himself to viewers of Iran's state-run television last Monday. "My first contact with the Israeli intelligence agency was in Istanbul three years ago. A man named Radfur approached me and suggested I visit the Israeli consulate."

These words opened the most spectacular confession ever shown on Iranian TV. Such self-incriminations, whether uttered by arrested members of the opposition or by foreign journalists, are far from a rare occurrence here. But Jamali's statements are unique in that this is the first time an Iranian has publically admitted to committing murder in the country's capital on orders from Iran's archenemy, Israel.

Jamali says he killed nuclear physicist Massoud Ali Mohammadi using a remote-controlled bomb on Jan. 12 last year, following precise planning and intensive training by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad.

Some aspects of this confession may be mere propaganda. But it nonetheless indicates that those who may have blackmailed or fabricated Jamali's statements felt compelled to admit that Iran's enemies have the capability of setting off bombs right in the heart of the country. The alleged perpetrator's dubious confession is simultaneously an admission on the part of the regime that a shadowy war over its nuclear program has begun.

Existential Significance

Strategists at international security policy think tanks are debating with increasing intensity when the time might come that Israel, with or without American help, will launch a military strike against Iran's suspected nuclear weapon production facilities. But the real question is now a different one: Has political pressure from the international community combined with clandestine activities on the part of Israel and the US managed to delay such a strike? Have Mossad's attacks damaged the theocracy's nuclear program to such a degree that it would now be impossible for Iran to build a nuclear bomb earlier than 2015?

For Israel, the question of whether Iran possesses nuclear weapons is a matter of existential significance. Such a bomb would constitute a threat to the Jewish state -- as well as to Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. One wonders if Israel's shadow war should be celebrated for reducing the chances of such an Armageddon.

Israel certainly has extensive experience in the world of covert war. Mossad, the country's foreign intelligence agency, abides by a line from the Talmud: "If a man comes to kill you, rise early and kill him first."

Meir Dagan, the much-honored former head of Mossad, retired late last year after eight years in office. Former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon named Dagan Israel's highest commander in the covert war against Iran's nuclear ambitions and Dagan concentrated his attention on precisely this mission.

The effectiveness of his covert operations can be seen in the accidents and setbacks that have repeatedly stalled Iran's nuclear program since then. Important scientists have disappeared without a trace, an unexplained fire broke out in a laboratory and an airplane belonging to the nuclear program crashed. In recent months, a computer worm called Stuxnet wreaked havoc on central control systems for the centrifuges at Iran's uranium enrichment facility in Natanz. The full scope of the damage from the worm is not yet known.

A Spotlight on the Shadows

Before leaving his post, Dagan spoke privately about his view of the situation. Unlike other Israelis, he doesn't believe Iran will be able to build a nuclear bomb before 2015 -- and it could even be later than that. Dagan's message is clear -- he opposes war with Iran, which he fears could escalate into all-out conflagration consuming the entire Middle East. He recommends continued covert operations instead, with which he implies Mossad could continue to delay Iran's creation of a bomb indefinitely.

Mossad's attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists right in the center of Tehran has cast a spotlight on Israel's shadowy war. Majid Jamali's confession -- assuming it isn't fabricated -- is a particular indication that the assassinations were the result of long-term planning and careful preparation.

Jamali is said to have received his first instructions at the Israeli consulate in Istanbul. "I talked to men there, who sat behind darkened windows. They questioned me and wanted me to obtain information on certain parts of Tehran for them," he says. Jamali says he returned to Iran before delivering 30 handwritten pages full of details on his second visit to Turkey. "My contacts were very pleased with my work," he adds.

Then, he says, his real training began. After various meetings in Europe and Thailand, he allegedly received the first installment of his payment for the assassination -- $30,000 (€22,500). A further sum of $20,000 was to be paid after the attack.

A Motorcycle at the Ready

Jamali says he received the crucial parts of his training in Israel, where Israeli agents simulated the Iranian physicist's house and street in a military camp near the highway between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Mossad also provided a Honda 125 motorcycle, a small and easily maneuverable vehicle common in Tehran. The plan was for Jamali to later outfit a motorcycle of the same model with a bomb, to be detonated in front of Mohammadi's house.

According to his confession, Jamali also received shooting lessons and a makeup artist taught him how to disguise himself with clothes and makeup. In the last phase of training, they did three run-throughs of his mission.

Back in Tehran, he says, other Mossad collaborators provided the necessary equipment. The motorcycle was standing ready, as was the bomb, and he received gloves and motorcycle clothing in two cardboard boxes. His equipment also included two satellite phones -- on one of those phones he received orders on the early morning of Jan. 12 to carry out the attack.

Jamali placed the motorcycle, outfitted with the bomb, on the driver's side of the physicist's driveway and detonated it as Mohammadi left his home that morning. The force of the blast was so powerful that it caused heavy flagstones to fall from the front of a four-story apartment building across the way and all the windows to burst. Mohammadi's car was completely destroyed and he died instantly.


Part 2: Magnetic Bombs and Poisoned Toothpaste

Dagan's secret assistants in Tehran appear to have carried out an operation that was similarly logistically intricate late last year, with a simultaneous double attack on two nuclear scientists, Majid Shahriari and Fereydoon Abbasi Davani.

Like Mohammadi, both men belonged to Iran's nuclear research elite. Officially, Shahriari worked as a professor of nuclear physics at Shahid Beheshti University in Tehran. His specialty was neutron transport, a process that plays a central role in chain reactions within reactors, but also in the construction of nuclear bombs. Abbasi taught in the same department and was one of the country's very few experts on isotope separation.

On November 29, Shahriari and Abbasi were both making their way to the university, as they did nearly every day. Shortly after 8 a.m., Shahriari was in his Peugeot sedan together with his wife, battling his way through the usual traffic on the Artesh Highway in the northern part of the city. He didn't pay particular attention when a motorcycle drove up close to the driver's side of his car -- such chaos is simply part of life on Tehran's overcrowded streets. By the time the motorcyclist attached something to Shahriari's door and sped away, it was too late. The bomb, affixed to the car with a magnet, exploded a few seconds later. Shahriari died instantly, but his wife survived the attack.

His colleague Abbasi was more attentive and reacted more quickly, which saved his life. The professor, also traveling with his wife, had just driven away from his home when he noticed a motorcyclist squeeze in close to his vehicle and stick something to the driver's side door. Abbasi, a long-time member of the Revolutionary Guards, braked immediately and launched himself out of the car, dragging his wife from the passenger seat and taking cover with her on the roadside, just fractions of a second before the device exploded.

Explosive Koran

Photographs of the scientists' destroyed cars made headline news the next day, and not just in Iran. News of the attacks caused a commotion around the world, including in Israel. The same day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced his intention to allow Mossad head Meir Dagan to retire. The mass-circulation Israeli daily Israel HaYom ran pictures of the attack in Tehran headlined with the question, "Dagan's last strike?"

Targeted killings outside of its borders have been used as a military weapon more often by Israel than by any other country. In its 63 years of existence, Israel has acquired a high degree of craftsmanship when it comes to snuffing out its opponents, and was the first country to develop the technology for targeted killings from the air.

In 1978 Israeli agents used poisoned toothpaste to kill Wadih Haddad, the leader of a faction of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP). Seven years later they packed a copy of the Koran with explosives and sent it to Ali-Akbar Mohtashamipur, Iran's ambassador to Syria. In 1997 they attempted, but ultimately failed, to assassinate Hamas leader Khaled Mashal with the neurotoxin botulin in the Jordanian capital, Amman.

And exactly a year ago, they appeared unconcerned that surveillance cameras captured each stage of their murder of Hamas activist Mahmoud al-Mabhouh -- allowing the world to examine the anatomy of that Dubai attack.

Underground militias plotting to undermine the British Mandate in Palestine were using targeted assassination even before the 1948 foundation of the state of Israel, often enough against each another. The Lehi organization, also known as the Stern Gang, was led by Yitzhak Shamir, who drew his inspiration from revolutionary communist movements and the Irish Republican Army (IRA). Russian-born Shamir thought nothing of killing dozens of Jews whom he suspected of collaborating with the British. He was also involved in the murders of a leading British minister and Folke Bernadotte, a Swedish UN diplomat.

Sword of Damocles

Shamir, who was Israeli prime minister in the late 1980s and early 90s, is one of a host of leading Israeli politicians and civil servants who were personally involved in targeted killings on behalf of their country before they moved into politics. They include, among others, Defense Minister Ehud Barak -- also a former Israeli prime minister -- and Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Ya'alon.

David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first prime minister, always rejected assassination because he considered it a breach of the rules of war. Nevertheless he ordered his country's first targeted killing, the 1956 assassination of Mustafa Hafi, the head of the Egyptian secret service, in the Gaza Strip.

Five years later the men who took part in this killing were called upon again to carry out Operation "Sword of Damocles" together with veterans of the Stern Gang, who now worked for Mossad. The aim of the mission was to murder or intimidate German scientists who had worked at the Nazis' rocket facility in Peenemünde during World War II, and were now helping Egypt develop its own arsenal of missiles. The operation was doomed, however, after a series of mishaps. Two Mossad agents, for instance, were arrested and taken to court in Switzerland for threatening the daughter of one scientist. Their arrest sparked outrage around the world and led to a diplomatic solution to the crisis: The German government offered the scientists new jobs if they agreed to cease working in Egypt and return home.

In the 1960s and 1970s rules were laid out under which the Israeli government could order such killings. The targets of such assassination squads fell into three categories: They were either terrorists, the political or military leaders of Israel's enemies, or people who manufactured weapons of mass destruction or made them available to the country's foes.

Last Man on the List

The most infamous of these Mossad-led killing sprees was the ruthless hunt for the people behind the massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich. The operation was more than a little revenge-driven, and proved the exception to the rule that killings should primarily serve to defend the state of Israel and its people.

After a botched attempt by German authorities to free the hostages at Munich Airport, which led to the killing of all the abducted Israeli athletes, then-Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir swore that none of those responsible would escape Israel's wrath. Mossad then drew up a hit-list that included prominent members of the PLO and of the Black September terrorist organization -- which carried out the attack -- living in Europe. The last man on this list, a PLO official called Atef Bseiso, was shot dead in Paris in 1992, two decades after the tragedy in Munich and only a year before the signing of the Oslo Peace Accord between Israel and the Palestinians.

Ali Hassan Salameh, the suspected mastermind of the massacre, was assassinated in Beirut in a Mossad operation in 1979. Six years earlier, a waiter called Ahmed Bouchiki had been shot dead in the Norwegian town of Lillehammer after he was falsely identified as Salameh. Five Mossad agents were arrested and sent to prison for Bouchiki's murder.

PLO leader Yasser Arafat survived at least 10 Mossad attempts on his life, and countless others were called off at the last minute for various reasons. Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, who fired Scud missiles at Israel during the Gulf War of 1991, was another political leader on Mossad's hit-list. His planned assassination in 1992 was aborted at the last minute after five Israeli soldiers died during a dry run of the operation.

Part 3: Can a Military Strike on Iran Be Avoided?

One murder that changed the course of Middle Eastern history was the assassination of Sheikh Abbas al-Mussawi, the secretary-general of the Lebanese Hezbollah movement. Al-Mussawi was killed in a helicopter attack on his motorcade in February 1992. The original plan had been simply to abduct him to use as a bargaining chip for the release of Israeli prisoners. But Ehud Barak, Israeli chief of staff at the time, forced through a last-minute change, convincing Prime Minister Shamir to order the cleric's assassination instead.

It seems clear that nobody gave serious thought to the possible consequences of such a flagrant act. Although the operation was a tactical success, it proved a strategic catastrophe -- and the reaction was not long in coming. A month after al-Mussawi's murder, a bomb exploded at the Israeli embassy in the Argentine capital, Buenos Aires, killing 29 Israelis as well as local staff.

Furthermore, al-Mussawi was replaced as Hezbollah leader by Hassan Nasrallah, who subsequently built the organization into a powerful and well-armed fighting force that controls southern Lebanon and has the power to hold all of northern Israel in check, as it demonstrated in the second Lebanon conflict of 2006. Today, Nasrallah is the decisive figure in his nation's political landscape. Only last week, the resignation of his Hezbollah ministers from the Lebanese cabinet plunged the entire country into disarray.

Worse still from Tel Aviv's point of view, the people it assassinated could have become successful negotiators in future peace talks. Take Arafat's erstwhile deputy, Khalil al-Wazer, better known by his nom-de-guerre, Abu Jihad. Many Israelis still think his execution in 1988 was a tragic mistake. Had Abu Jihad remained alive, he may well have been a more charismatic leader than Arafat or Mahmoud Abbas, the current Palestinian Authority president, and perhaps been in a position to end the simmering conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

Unintended Consequences

Regardless of whether or not such executions are morally justifiable, Mossad murders have had unintended consequences. There's no better evidence for this than the chain of events which began with the attempt to kill deputy Hamas leader Khalid Mashal in the Jordanian capital in 1997. Mossad agents attacked Mashal in Amman with a neurotoxin, but were caught red-handed by the Jordanian police. As part of the agreement for the return of its agents, Israel had to both provide the Jordanian authorities with the antidote for the poison and release Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin from prison. Shortly after his liberation, Sheikh Yassin toured Arab countries collecting donations that he used to launch a wave of murderous assaults on Israel beginning in 2000 and continuing until he was killed by an Israeli helicopter gunship attack in 2004. In the meantime, the failed attempt on Mashal gave him so much prestige that he took over the leadership of Hamas in exile soon after Yassin's death, and was able to forge closer ties to Shiite Iran than the fundamentalist Sunni Yassin would have ever permitted.

When Mossad targeted scientists who helped Israel's enemies make weapons of mass destruction, the operations were often justified in public as countering an existential threat to Israel and its citizens. This line of reasoning often centered on the Holocaust and the persecution of Europe's Jews. When Israel found itself under the greatest threat, Ben-Gurion is said to have told staff that his greatest fear was that he may have brought the survivors of the European Jewry to Israel only to have them suffer a second Holocaust.

Whenever the threat to the very existence of Israel is debated, there is always someone who equates Israel's enemies with Hitler. In the 1950s and 1960s Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser was the bogeyman. In the 1970s it was Arafat. In the 1990s it was Saddam Hussein, and today it is Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad.

Israel's leaders have always worried about the possible physical annihilation of their country, and it is this perceived threat that has formed their justification for the policy of assassination, even though it constitutes a breach of international law and the sovereignty of other nations.

Sowing Fear

The number of such killings increased dramatically under Meir Dagan. Following his appointment as Mossad director in 2002, Dagan took advantage of this policy, primarily with respect to Iran. Dagan sees the regime in Tehran as representing two basic dangers that threaten the current generation of Israelis: terrorism and nuclear warfare.

Dagan, whom Prime Minister Ariel Sharon once said was particularly skilled at separating Arabs from their heads, has always been surprisingly moderate in his attitude toward military action by the Israeli army. He firmly believes that war should be a weapon of last resort. Dagan only recently spoke out against attacking Iran -- in contrast to the more hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Barak.

Although Dagan thinks Iran poses a threat to Israel's existence and that the Iranian regime would use nuclear weapons against Israel should it ever obtain them, he is convinced that concerted action can, at the very least, lead to a significant delay in Iran's nuclear program, if not a scrapping of the project altogether. This would require a combination of international diplomatic pressure, tough economic sanctions, the prevention of the sale of nuclear technology and hardware, support for non-Shiite opposition forces in Iran -- and, last but not least, secret Mossad operations.

He also presents evidence to back his theory up: He says the death of Iranian nuclear scientists has slowed the development of the nuclear program and sowed fear among their colleagues, many of whom subsequently failed to turn up for work on the following days.

It's still anyone's guess whether Prime Minister Netanyahu will be swayed by the optimistic assessment of his former intelligence chief that there's still plenty of time to continue mounting secret operations against Tehran. And it could well be that Netanyahu still prefers a far more dangerous solution to the Iranian problem.

Translated from the German by Jan Liebelt and Ella Ornstein